Disgust is the Cinderella of emotions. While fear, sadness and anger, its nasty, flashy sisters, have drawn the rapt attention of psychologists, poor disgust has been hidden away in a corner, left to muck around in the ashes.
No longer. Disgust is having its moment in the light as researchers find that it does more than cause that sick feeling in the stomach. It protects human beings from disease and parasites, and affects almost every aspect of human relations, from romance to politics.
In several new books and a steady stream of research papers, scientists are exploring the evolution of disgust and its role in attitudes toward food, sexuality and other people.
Paul Rozin, a psychologist who is an emeritus professor at the University of Pennsylvania and a pioneer of modern disgust research, began researching it with a few collaborators in the 1980s, when disgust was far from the mainstream.
"It was always the other emotion," he said. "Now it’s hot."
It still won’t wear glass slippers, which may be just as well, given the stuff it has to walk through. Nonetheless, its reach takes disgust beyond the realms of rot and excrement.
Speaking last week from a conference on disgust in Germany, Valerie Curtis, a self-described "disgustologist" from the London School of Public Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, described her favorite emotion as "incredibly important."
It adds to the popularity of disgust as a subject of basic research that it is easier to elicit in an ethical manner than anger or fear. You don’t have to insult someone or make anyone afraid for his or her life — a bad smell will do the trick. And disgust has been relatively easy to locate in the brain, where it frequents the insula, the amygdala and other regions.
"It is becoming a model emotion," said Jonathan Haidt of the University of Virginia, a disgust pioneer with Rozin.
And the research may have practical benefits, including clues to obsessive compulsive disorder, some aspects of which — like excessive handwashing — look like disgust gone wild.
Conversely, some researchers are trying to inspire more disgust at dirt and germs to promote handwashing and improve public health.
Curtis is involved in efforts in Africa, India and England to explore what she calls "the power of trying to gross people out." One slogan that appeared to be effective in England in getting people to wash their hands before leaving a bathroom was "Don’t bring the toilet with you."
Disgust was not completely ignored in the past. Charles Darwin tackled the subject in The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. He described the face of disgust, documented by Guillaume-Benjamin Duchenne in his study of facial expressions in 1862, as if one were expelling some horrible substance from the mouth.
There are many variations in how scientists now view disgust, but one new approach by evolutionary psychologists was captured in a December special issue of The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Disease Avoidance: From Animals to Culture, and in a conference on The Evolution of Disgust this month in Germany.
Curtis contributed to the issue and the conference, and emphasized above all disgust as an adaptation to avoid disease-causing microbes and parasites that involves not only taste and smell but also sight and touch.
"To me the story is quite simple," she said. The animal origins of disgust involve all sorts of ways that diseases are spread, including fleas, so there are a variety of signs of disease and types of disgust.
Under that evolutionary umbrella, however, there is still the question of what kinds of disgust there are. Haidt, Rozin and Clark McCauley of Bryn Mawr College claim nine different domains of disgust for North Americans. Curtis proposes seven categories. Joshua Tybur of VU University in Amsterdam proposed three domains of disgust, three separate psychological programs, for disease avoidance, mate choice and moral judgment.
"People who are sensitive to one type of disgust are not necessarily sensitive to another," he said.
Still, it’s not always easy to say in which domain a form of disgust fits, and there is no reason that more than one can’t operate at the same time, given the right stimulus. Jeffrey Dahmer killed and ate people he had had sex with — a disgust trifecta if there ever was one.
Whatever the fine points of disgust, its power to affect behaviour is unquestioned, and that power ought to be put to good use, Curtis said. So, in one of her projects, she has worked with an Indian public relations agency to come up with a disgust-based campaign to encourage handwashing among mothers in small villages, which could save countless children’s lives lost to diarrhea and other diseases.
The result, now being tested, is a skit involving two characters, one a supermom and the other a disgusting, dirty man. The man makes sweets using mud and worms, stops in the middle of the performance to rush off because he has diarrhea, never washes his hands and does everything possible to be revolting.
Supermom is always clean. Her children don’t get sick, the skit makes clear. In fact, her baby grows up to be a doctor. She washes her hands all the time.
The prominence of diarrhea in the skit is no accident. One thing about studying disgust, Curtis said, is that it makes you realize how important it is to talk about the very things that disgust us, because they often present dangers to public health.
